In Khalid Hasan’s
Honor
Pakistan: Dream Deferred or Denied?
'American trade policy discriminates against
Pakistan' - Robert Hathaway
'Subdivide Pakistan into 16 provinces' - Shuja
Nawaz
By Rana Fawad
Posted
February 26, 2009

WASHINGTON: Though we used to be on the receiving end in the late Khalid
Hasan’s columns, he always exhibited professionalism as a journalist.
This view, expressed by Prof. Stephen Cohen, was shared by all speakers
at an event held in honor of the late Pakistani-American journalist,
author and translator Khalid Hasan (1934-2009), who died of cancer on
February 5.
Organized by nine Washington-based nonprofits, the event (Pakistan:
Dream Deferred or Denied?) was held on Wednesday (February 25, 2009) at
the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
Prominent among the cosponsors included the Brookings Institution,
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Heritage Foundation, Middle
East Institute, United States Institute of Peace, and Woodrow Wilson
International Center for Scholars.
Ambassador Teresita C. Schaffer, Director South Asia Program CSIS, and
Stephen Cohen welcomed the guests.
The speakers included Stephen Cohen, Senior Fellow (Foreign Policy
Studies, the Brookings Institution), J. Alexander Their (Senior Rule of
Law Adviser, United States Institute of Peace), Shuja Nawaz (South Asia,
Atlantic Council), Robert Hathaway (Director, Asia Program, Woodrow
Wilson International Center for Scholars), and Marvin Weinbaum
(Scholar-in-Residence, Middle East Institute).
The proceedings were divided into two panel discussions. First session
was moderated by Lisa Curtis.
Prof.
Stephen told the audience that Khalid Hasan would write what was right
in his view and added that when an Iraqi journalist threw shoes on
President George Bush, Khalid took a position which was highly unpopular
in Pakistan.
The professor referred to Khalid Hasan’s column in which he criticized
the Iraqi journalist for breaching the trust that gives journalists
proximity to presidents and other high officials so that they could
carry out their journalistic duties. “Journalists should use their pens
and cameras not their shoes to express themselves,” the professor quoted
from Khalid Hasan’s column.
Elaborating on Pakistan’s situation, Prof. Stephen commented that the
United States ignored Pakistan’s domestic problems as well as nuclear
program in the past. He regretted that the Bush
administration missed an opportunity to help set things right in
Pakistan after 2002. He said unfortunately the American policy was
focused on one person, General Pervez Musharraf, who was not up to the
task than Ayub Khan (Pakistan’s former military ruler in the 1960s).
Referring to the last sentence (is it too late for Pakistan) of his book
The Idea of Pakistan, Prof. Stephen remarked, “I can’t give you
an answer for that.” He explained that the book dealt with several
scenarios of Pakistan’s future.
He expounded that although parts of Pakistan seem to be turning into
radical Islamic sub-states, he doesn’t think it’s going to become an
Islamic state. In his view chances of a functioning democracy are also
slim, though parts of the country operate under democratic norms and
values.
As for the possibility of military dictatorship, Prof. Stephen said it
was possible again and it could be an incompetent but benign government
like General Musharraf’s rule. He added that it could also continue as
an elite dominated coalition of military and political forces.
The senior analyst commented that the possibility of Pakistan continuing in the future
as a stable, benevolent elite dominated country is probably less than
what I thought it would have been five or eight years ago.
Enumerating Pakistan’s problems, Prof. Stephen remarked that “Economy
under Musharraf did not prosper” and added that “Pakistan is ill-equipped
to deal with the modern globalization.”
In his opinion Pakistan’s army is facing three challenges at present:
India, tribal areas, and domestic radicalism.
However, he termed Pakistan’s nongovernment organizations and moderate
youth as a positive sign for the future of the country. Similarly, he
believes that Pakistan’s neighbors including India do want to see
Pakistan a stable country. He pointed out that it is the time for
American diplomacy to align other nations like China, India, and Saudi
Arabia to promote stability in Pakistan.
The professor
concluded that in the end, it is up to Pakistanis to decide what kind of
Pakistan they want?
Paying tribute to the late journalist, J. Alexander Thier, Senior Rule
of Law Adviser, United States Institute of Peace, said
journalists like Khalid Hasan were the only conduits of information on
emerging problems in Afghanistan in
when the western media was not
covering this region.
He told the audience that Khalid Hasan employed humor in his columns to
express his view on various issues and read out an excerpt from his
column he had written against a proposed Sharia bill in the previous
provincial assembly of the North-West Frontier Province. Khalid Hasan wrote, “The
adopted bill in the NWFP assembly for the second time is a slap in the
face of the vast majority of the people of Pakistan who abhor the
mullah’s Islam which is a travesty of Islam’s inner spirit of
rationalism, decency and tolerance.”
Alexander commented that the excerpt was striking to him over and over
because this perspective was shared by so many Pakistanis that he had
come to know.
Referring to the current situation in Pakistan, he remarked, “I think we all are deeply
troubled by the combination of political fragmentation and
radicalization that is occurring there.”
“The story of political fragmentation is an old one,” he said and
added that unfortunately in some ways it has contributed over and over
to the swing of pendulum between democracy and totalitarianism.
Explaining the radicalization, particularly in the frontier region, he
was of the view that basically there was no outlet for politics. He
said that the absence of possibilities of actively participating in
economic development of Pakistan could create an enormous potential for
people to support political movements which take advantage of their
frustration.
Alexander pointed out that loose nukes or the threat of loose nukes,
jihadists, and economic meltdown have made Pakistan a high priority on
the US security agenda. He told the audience that the Obama
administration was extremely concerned about Pakistan.
He suggested that to address the fears about Pakistan the policy should
be geared towards how to engage Pakistani society. Referring to his own visits
to different Pakistani areas and meetings with Pakistanis, Alexander
remarked that at human level I think Pakistani society is fundamentally
a tolerant society.
He termed the explosion of free media in Pakistan a positive development
and said that it helped engage the society in an informed debate.
Remembering Khalid Hasan,
Lisa Curtis (Heritage Foundation) said most of us were deeply shocked at
the news of his passing.
She remarked that Khalid was
a professional journalist and always
asked questions that would put you on the spot. "He never threw soft
balls," she recalled. Plucking from her
memories
about Khalid Hasan, she told the audience that he attended almost every
Pakistan related event. As for his opinion, she said many a time he would not accept our
viewpoint on certain issues but knew how to agree to disagree.
Commenting on the current situation in Pakistan, Lisa commented that the
country was facing a incredible challenges including economic problems
that threaten to bankrupt Pakistan and an increased threat from the
Taliban in its North-West Frontier Province. "And ongoing political
instability fuelled by the reality that the military retains primary
control of the country's national security decision making and on those
issues that are prime importance to the US namely the policy toward
Afghanistan and India," she added.
Lisa also mentioned that the Obama
administration's was reviewing it strategies in Afghanistan and Pakistan
displaying a welcome recognition that terrorist threats in these two
countries cannot be viewed in isolation. "And there has been a
particular focus on the Swat agreement," Lisa informed the gathering.
She was skeptical about the recent Swat
deal between the local Taliban and the Awami
Nation Party’s provincial government. "We are all want peace and
reconciliation in Pakistan but neither do we want to see Talibanization
of Pakistan and there are valid reasons to believe that this deal can
contribute to strengthening the hands of Taliban in Pakistan," she
opined.
Lisa Curtis said
she was very skeptical about the pact because of her past experience and
observation about the Taliban. She said when the Taliban took
over most of Afghanistan they became radical and used repression of
women as a tool in consolidating their power and the same thing is
happening in Swat.
She mentioned that during her visit to Pakistan last December she met
with many people and discovered that people in Swat were scared and felt
helpless that the federal government did not have any strategy to deal
with the situation.
(Continued)
[Top]